Corrections Log
By Adv. Manish Sharma · Last updated: 1 August 2026
When something on this site is wrong — a citation, a date, a drafting mistake — it is corrected promptly and recorded below, in plain language, with the date. See the editorial policy for the sourcing standard this log enforces.
How to report an error
Call or message the chamber (details below) with the page and what looks wrong — the page URL or title, and the specific line if possible, makes verification fastest. Every report is checked against the primary source — the bare Act, the notification, or the judgment — before any change is made. There is no obligation to identify yourself beyond what is needed to follow up if a clarification is required; a general description of the error is enough to begin the check.
Log
This log will grow as corrections are made. An empty period between entries means no error was found or reported in that time, not that the site went unreviewed.
What an empty log is worth
A corrections log with nothing in it is not proof of a perfect site — it is only as good as the review process behind it, described on the editorial policy page: primary-source citation for every legal statement, verification before publishing, and a standing invitation to report anything that looks wrong. The log exists so that when an error is found, the fix is visible and dated rather than silently edited away. Readers who spot something incorrect are the fastest way this log grows accurately — a report costs nothing and is checked against the primary source before any change is made.
What this log does not include
Routine copy edits — fixing a typo, tightening a sentence, adding a cross-link to a newer page — are not logged here individually, because they do not change what a page asserts about the law. What is logged is any change that corrects a factual or legal claim: a wrong section number, a superseded figure, a misdescribed procedure, or a citation that turned out not to support the point made. The distinction matters because a log padded with cosmetic entries would make genuine corrections harder to find, not easier.
Why a solo chamber logs this at all
A larger legal-content operation might have a formal correction committee or a multi-editor review chain; this is one advocate's chamber, and the log reflects that scale honestly rather than imitating a structure that does not exist here. What it can offer instead is directness — a report reaches Advocate Sharma himself, not a queue, and a genuine error is fixed and dated without the delay a larger process might introduce. The trade-off is that there is no second reviewer to catch what the author misses first, which is precisely why the editorial policy leans on primary-source citation rather than a second signature as its accuracy check.
Why does an empty corrections log matter?
What counts as a correction worth logging here?
Any factual or legal inaccuracy — a wrong section number, an outdated figure, a misstated procedural step — once verified and fixed. Minor copy-editing (spelling, formatting) is not logged separately unless it also changes the substance of a claim.
How is a reported error checked before the page is changed?
Every report is checked against the primary source — the bare Act, the relevant notification, or the judgment cited — before any change is made, consistent with the sourcing standard in the editorial policy. A report that turns out to be mistaken is not logged as a correction — it may still prompt a page to be reworded for clarity if the original phrasing was genuinely confusing, even where the underlying legal statement was correct all along.
Report an error
The chamber may be contacted by telephone or WhatsApp. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice.
Call Message on WhatsApp